Thank you reviewers- CytoJournal 2006

Thank you reviewers- CytoJournal 2007

Significant efforts, time, and resources are devoted for peer-reviewing numerous CytoJournal manuscripts. The Editorial Board of CytoJournal shares a significant proportion of this activity. Additional peers are requested to join periodically as 'academic editors' and reviewers to review CytoJournal manuscripts. We thank all the reviewers and academic editors for their time and efforts for comp...

Interactive comment on “Molecular analysis of the microbial community structures in water-flooding petroleum reservoirs with different temperatures”

Dear Dr. Kirsten Küsel, We would like to thank you and the reviewers for your time and efforts to review our manuscript. We also thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. The two reviewer’s comments were considered carefully and we have addressed the issues raised accordingly. Detailed answers to the reviewers’ comments are given below in the section Authors’ Responses to...

Thank you to our reviewers 2017

Thank you.

A scientific journal exists only because of the good will and assistance of its reviewers. We can only publish less than a fifth of the papers we receive and, in making our decisions, we depend on the expertise of many people. This year a total of 315 reviewers have helped us to decide about the papers that we should publish. Their names are listed below and we would like to take this opportuni...

Dear Editors and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Membrane protein Nav1.7 contributes to the persistent post-surgical pain regulated by p-p65 in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) of SMIR rats